We asked each of the candidates 12 questions about their vision of the board. These are the responses we received from Marie van der Zyl.
Click here to return to the main post, but see how they answered the question above here.
What are the most pressing concerns you feel the community needs the Board of Deputies to focus on?
The most pressing concern is clearly that of antisemitism in the Labour Party fuelled by the distrust of the community of the leadership of the party. However there are a range of other concerns or challenges for the Board including with the growth of the Haredi communities, social cohesion and within the constituencies of the Board youth alienation.
What is the one thing you love most about the Board?
I love its democracy. It is one of the most unique institutions within the British community. It isn’t something to be taken for granted and certainly not subverted but rather it should be cherished and protected.
What is the one thing that most frustrates you about the Board?
The flip side of the democratic culture is process. Sometimes there is a sense that process can induce a sclertotic effect on the Board. The more we can do to steamline things and especially to encourage greater participation the better.
What will you do to make plenaries and meetings productive?
I will hold debates at plenary meetings for example in relation to the recent organ donation issue. This will make the Board THE place to debate the issues of the day . It will also require content and thought to the contribution and lead to better behaviour and enable all points of view to be expressed .
I will also ensure meetings are conducted courteously with diversity of opinion being respected .
How will you represent and work with people who you disagree with?
The Deputies represent a broad range range of opinion on all manner of things and difference of opinion and view point is to be encouraged. Difference is strength, but it has to be in a broadly defined consensus.
We combine together for a reason. I do and will take this philosophy into the way I work, consulting, encouraging voices to be heard and ensuring that our counterparts appreciate the depth and breadth of the Board.
How will you represent the diversity of opinion in our community with regards to Israel?
We all agree on the centrality of Israel to our identity. We all care for the welfare of the people of Israel and our concern for their security is next to our hearts.
We all admire the achievements of Israel and worry about the threats to the country. When Israel is in danger we must show solidarity.
Beyond that there will be differing views on how Israel’s best interests are served. We should represent clearly both our essential consensus but also acknowledging our strength in diverse opinion.
How will you continue the Board’s record of combating racism and antisemitism both in and out of the community?
We must build alliances within the community and with other communities ,to ensure our voices are louder .Hence The importance of intercommunal work, something I’ve taken seriously through my many visits to the places of worship of other faiths and as a trustee of the Interfaith Network .
My record on antisemitism is clear, we as explained build alliances in and out of the community and we never appease. We always call it out. That’s not to say there isn’t a role for a quiet diplomacy (see my work at LSE) but that’s different to accepting an accommodation with it.
Do we need a zero tolerance policy of racism in Jewish communal organisations?
Yes is the simple answer. Its way to say but it requires effort and focus and honesty to ensure it happens.
How will you ensure that young people are spoken to rather than spoken about?
I’m not sure about ‘to’ as well as ‘about’, we should be ‘together’. And that is certainly the approach I have always deployed with UJS. One of my proposals is to have an impact study conducted by the gender equality officer to reach a clearer understanding of which areas of the community are least represented in the Board and to adjust the executive to allow for enhanced representation.
Of course this is just a step in increasing the dialogue with both peer led organisations and others such as the JLGB, youth movements and the UJIA who work with young people. I will also soon be coaching the newly appointed 20 year old JLGB Deputy .
I also wish to ensure young people are not tokens or just consulted but are an actual part of the decision making process.I am also by far the youngest person standing for President !
How will you use the Board’s profile and stature to shine a light on the great work of other communal groups?
The Board has an obvious imperative to promote its own work but the Board’s own work will be enhanced by a greater ability to work with other often more specialist organisations. To do the is the Board should be less insecure and be more prepared to share credit with and indeed promote the work of others. The Coroner case was a great example of this.
What will the Board look like in 3 years’ time under your leadership?
It will, with the participation of all of the Deputies, continue to be build on its enhanced standing within the community by providing leadership on the really important issues. Internally I would hope it will be a place where there is more debate, where people feel their voices can be heard and will make a difference, and a board becoming ever more diverse and in tune with the current zeitgeist.
What will the Jewish community look like in 3 years’ time under your leadership?
This is a big question indeed. I don’t think we should over state the relevance of the Board here. The Board’s role is to represent and serve but we mustn’t get above ourselves and think we can effect fundamental changes to this great community of ours.
For that we have multiples of differing spiritual and lay leaders and teachers, and institutions. The Board mustn’t be arrogant. There are clear trends within the community as are highlighted by the JPR and there is no reason to think there will be drastic change in the next three years unless some of the threats to the community are actualised and it is here that the Board can make its biggest difference.
It will take approximately 15 years based on JPR research for 50% of babies to be born to Charedi families .